Attorney Statistics for Cases in Our Database
Win Rate
Samuel has won an estimated 71.43% of legal cases in our database that were fully litigated. This lawyer has won at least 5 legal cases and lost at least 2 legal cases. Win rates vary widely between different types of cases, so please view this attorney's individual practice area results below for more information.
The estimated win rate is computed based on fully litigated cases, meaning cases that were pursued to a win or loss. It does not count other case outcomes such as settlements and plea bargains.
Experience
Samuel has handled at least 12 legal cases in our database.
Settlement Rate
Samuel settles an estimated 0.00% of legal cases and litigates 100.00% of legal cases to conclusion, based on our database. This lawyer has settled at least 0 legal cases and litigated to conclusion at least 7 legal cases.
For purposes of this chart, both settlements and plea bargains are counted as settlements, as opposed to cases litigated to conclusion.
Win Rate Comparison
Samuel's win rate is higher than the average win rate for attorneys handling legal cases primarily for consumers in our database. The bar graph shows Samuel's win rate compared to the average.
Experience Comparison
Samuel has handled more legal cases than the average attorney handling legal cases primarily for consumers in our database.
Summary
Samuel has a strong win rate (estimated) of 71.43% in legal cases in our database and is rated an excellent 5.0 or 4.5 stars in numerous practice areas.
Samuel excels as a business lawyer, earning high marks with a 5.0 star rating based on estimated win rate and experience.
Samuel also handles contracts matters and earns a strong 5.0 star rating in that field.
Moreover, Samuel appears to obtain impressive results in civil tax cases, meriting a 4.0 star rating.
Much more detailed information about this lawyer is presented in the charts and tables below.
Our Ratings
We rate Samuel's performance in each case type, and we also show the attorney's case outcomes used to compute our rating. The data in the following table are AI-computed estimates based on cases in our database.
Click on the details button below to learn more about the attorney's rating and performance in that case type.
# | Case Type |
Rating
|
Win Rate |
Settlement / Plea Rate |
Total Cases | Wins | Losses | Settled |
Plea Bargain |
Details |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
Overall
|
5.0 | 71.43% | 0.00% | 12 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | Details |
2 |
Civil
|
5.0 | 71.43% | 0.00% | 12 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | Details |
3 |
Business
|
5.0 | 66.67% | 0.00% | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | Details |
4 |
Contract
|
5.0 | 100.00% | 0.00% | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Details |
5 |
Appeal
|
4.5 | 60.00% | 0.00% | 8 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | Details |
6 |
Civil Tax
|
4.0 | 100.00% | 0.00% | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Details |
7 |
Employment
|
3.5 | 100.00% | 0.00% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Details |
8 |
Real Estate
|
3.5 | 0.00% | 1 | 0 | 0 | Details |
Reviews
Similar Attorneys near Ashburn
Cases
Our case-reading artificial intelligence program has analyzed Samuel's cases from our database and summarized them in the following table. Click the details button for a detailed record of the case.
Any systematic or automated data collection from this website is strictly prohibited. Submit corrections to support@justicetoolbox.com.
# | Case Name | Number | Filing Date | For Party | Court | Case Type |
Outcome Detail |
Outcome (AI-estimated) |
Details |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Speed v. Transamerica Corporation | 135 F. Supp. 176, Nos. 480, 468, 490. | 11/02/1955 | Plaintiff | District Court, D. Delaware | Business Civil Civil Tax Contract | -- | Undetermined | Details |
2 | In Re Gurinsky | 196 F.2d 296, No. 214. | 04/24/1952 | Appellee | Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit | Appeal Civil | -- | Win | Details |
3 | Speed v. Transamerica Corp. | 99 F. Supp. 808, Nos. 430, 468, 490. | 09/20/1951 | Plaintiff | District Court, D. Delaware | Business Civil Civil Tax Contract Employment | -- | Win | Details |
4 | Speed v. Transamerica Corp. | 100 F. Supp. 461, Nos. 480, 468, 490. | 09/20/1951 | Plaintiff | District Court, D. Delaware | Civil | -- | Win | Details |
5 | Federal Liquidating Corp. v. Securities and Exchange Commission. Edelstein v. Securities and Exchange Commission | 187 F.2d 804, No. 116. | 03/16/1951 | Petitioner | Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit | Appeal Business Civil | -- | Undetermined | Details |
6 | Zahn v. Transamerica Corporation | 162 F.2d 36, No. 9056. | 06/30/1947 | Appellant | Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit | Appeal Business Civil Contract | -- | Win | Details |
7 | In Re JP Linahan | 138 F.2d 650, Nos. 142, 143. | 11/08/1943 | Debtor | Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit | Appeal Civil | -- | Undetermined | Details |
8 | Piccard v. Sperry Corporation | 120 F.2d 328, No. 318. | 06/05/1941 | Appellant | Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit | Appeal Civil | -- | Undetermined | Details |
9 | Moore v. Linahan | 117 F.2d 140, No. 156. | 01/27/1941 | Appellant | Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit | Appeal Civil | -- | Loss | Details |
10 | In Re JP Linahan, Inc. | 111 F.2d 590, No. 335. | 05/06/1940 | Appellant | Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit | Appeal Civil | -- | Win | Details |
11 | Pioneer Utilities Corporation v. Scott-Newcomb, Inc. | 26 F. Supp. 616, No. 182. | 02/14/1939 | Plaintiff | District Court, E.D. New York | Business Civil Contract | -- | Undetermined | Details |
12 | In Re Prudence Co. | 79 F.2d 77, No. 358. | 07/22/1935 | Creditor / Appellant | Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit | Appeal Business Civil Real Estate | -- | Loss | Details |
Contact
Samuel
J.
Levinson
New York City
Per our terms of service (link below), any systematic or automated data collection from this website is strictly prohibited.