Attorney Statistics for Cases in Our Database
Win Rate
Richard has won an estimated 55.56% of legal cases in our database that were fully litigated. This lawyer has won at least 5 legal cases and lost at least 4 legal cases. Win rates vary widely between different types of cases, so please view this attorney's individual practice area results below for more information.
The estimated win rate is computed based on fully litigated cases, meaning cases that were pursued to a win or loss. It does not count other case outcomes such as settlements and plea bargains.
Experience
Richard has handled at least 11 legal cases in our database.
Settlement Rate
Richard settles an estimated 0.00% of legal cases and litigates 100.00% of legal cases to conclusion, based on our database. This lawyer has settled at least 0 legal cases and litigated to conclusion at least 9 legal cases.
For purposes of this chart, both settlements and plea bargains are counted as settlements, as opposed to cases litigated to conclusion.
Win Rate Comparison
Richard's win rate is higher than the average win rate for attorneys handling legal cases primarily for consumers in our database. The bar graph shows Richard's win rate compared to the average.
Experience Comparison
Richard has handled more legal cases than the average attorney handling legal cases primarily for consumers in our database.
Summary
Richard has a solid win rate (estimated) in legal cases in our database and is rated an excellent 4.5 or 4.0 stars in several practice areas.
Richard excels as a contracts lawyer, earning high marks with a 4.5 star rating based on estimated win rate and experience.
Much more detailed information about this lawyer is presented in the charts and tables below.
Our Ratings
We rate Richard's performance in each case type, and we also show the attorney's case outcomes used to compute our rating. The data in the following table are AI-computed estimates based on cases in our database.
Click on the details button below to learn more about the attorney's rating and performance in that case type.
| # | Case Type |
Rating
|
Win Rate |
Settlement / Plea Rate |
Total Cases | Wins | Losses | Settled |
Plea Bargain |
Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Overall
|
4.5 | 55.56% | 0.00% | 11 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 0 | Details |
| 2 |
Civil
|
4.5 | 57.14% | 0.00% | 8 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | Details |
| 3 |
Contract
|
4.5 | 66.67% | 0.00% | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | Details |
| 4 |
Criminal
|
4.0 | 50.00% | 0.00% | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | Details |
| 5 |
Appeal
|
3.5 | 0.00% | 4 | 0 | 0 | Details | |||
| 6 |
Business
|
3.5 | 0.00% | 2 | 0 | 0 | Details | |||
| 7 |
Employment
|
3.0 | 0.00% | 1 | 0 | 0 | Details |
Reviews
Similar Attorneys near Ashburn
Cases
Our case-reading artificial intelligence program has analyzed Richard's cases from our database and summarized them in the following table. Click the details button for a detailed record of the case.
Any systematic or automated data collection from this website is strictly prohibited. Submit corrections to support@justicetoolbox.com.
| # | Case Name | Number | Filing Date | For Party | Court | Case Type |
Outcome Detail |
Outcome (AI-estimated) |
Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Spang & Co. v. USX Corp. | 410 Pa. Super. 254 | 10/15/1991 | Appellant | Superior Court of Pennsylvania | Civil Contract | -- | Win | Details |
| 2 | Spang & Co. v. US Steel Corp. | 519 Pa. 14 | 07/12/1988 | Appellee | Supreme Court of Pennsylvania | Business Civil Contract | -- | Loss | Details |
| 3 | Studiengesellschaft Kohle, mbH v. USX Corp. | 675 F. Supp. 182, No. 85-236 LON. | 12/18/1987 | Defendant | District Court, D. Delaware | Civil | -- | Win | Details |
| 4 | Nannette B. Davis v. Usx Corporation | 819 F.2d 1270, No. 86-3705. | 06/03/1987 | Defendant-appellee | Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit | Appeal Business Civil Employment | -- | Loss | Details |
| 5 | 39 Fair empl.prac.cas. 955, 38 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 35,796 Nannette B. Davis v. United States Steel Corporation and Its Division, Uss Agri-Chemicals | 779 F.2d 209, No. 85-1302. | 12/12/1985 | Appellee | Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit | Appeal Criminal | -- | Loss | Details |
| 6 | 34 Fair empl.prac.cas. 886, 34 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 34,307 Robert E. Mitchell, United States Steel Corp. v. James B. McCorstin Jr., Movant-Appellant | 728 F.2d 1422, No. 83-7402 | 04/06/1984 | Defendant-appellee | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Appeal Criminal | -- | Undetermined | Details |
| 7 | 29 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1202, 30 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 33,045 Thelma Davis v. United States Steel Supply, Division of United States Steel Corporation | 688 F.2d 166, No. 80-2571. | 08/30/1982 | Appellant | Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit | Appeal Criminal | -- | Win | Details |
| 8 | Potts v. Dow Chemical Co. | 272 Pa. Super. 323, No. 263, SS 6, 77 P.S. SS 481 | 12/05/1979 | Appellee | Superior Court of Pennsylvania | Civil Contract | -- | Win | Details |
| 9 | Dixon v. Universal Atlas Cement Division | 437 F. Supp. 1071, No. 76-1469. | 04/07/1977 | Defendant | District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania | Civil | -- | Undetermined | Details |
| 10 | MULLEN v. US Steel Corp. | 28 Pa. Commw. 19, No. 500 C.D. 1976. | 12/22/1976 | Appellant | Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania | Civil | -- | Loss | Details |
| 11 | MERRYMAN v. US Steel Corp. | 26 Pa. Commw. 569, No. 144 C.D. 1976. | 10/14/1976 | Appellant | Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania | Civil | -- | Win | Details |
Per our terms of service (link below), any systematic or automated data collection from this website is strictly prohibited.
