Attorney Statistics for Employment Cases in Our Database
Daniel has won an estimated 100.00% of employment cases in our database that were fully litigated. This lawyer has won at least 2 employment cases and lost at least 0 employment cases.
The estimated win rate is computed based on fully litigated cases, meaning cases that were pursued to a win or loss. It does not count other case outcomes such as settlements and plea bargains.
Daniel has handled at least 2 employment cases in our database.
Daniel settles an estimated 0.00% of employment cases and litigates 100.00% of employment cases to conclusion, based on our database. This lawyer has settled at least 0 employment cases and litigated to conclusion at least 2 employment cases.
For purposes of this chart, both settlements and plea bargains are counted as settlements, as opposed to cases litigated to conclusion.
Win Rate Comparison
Daniel's win rate is higher than the average win rate for attorneys handling employment cases primarily for businesses and institutions in our database. The bar graph shows Daniel's win rate compared to the average.
Daniel has handled more employment cases than the average attorney handling employment cases primarily for businesses and institutions in our database.
Daniel has a superb win rate (estimated) of 100.00% in employment cases in our database and is experienced with at least 2 employment cases handled.
Daniel excels as a civil lawyer, earning high marks with a 5.0 star rating based on estimated win rate and experience. One area with particularly outstanding results is employment cases.
Daniel also handles personal injury matters and earns a strong 4.5 star rating in that field. We would especially point out the attorney's results in car accident cases.
Much more detailed information about this lawyer is presented in the charts and tables below.
We rate Daniel's performance in each case type, and we also show the attorney's case outcomes used to compute our rating. The data in the following table are AI-computed estimates based on cases in our database.
Click on the details button below to learn more about the attorney's rating and performance in that case type.
Similar Attorneys who handle Employment Cases near Ashburn
Our case-reading artificial intelligence program has analyzed Daniel's cases from our database and summarized them in the following table. Click the details button for a detailed record of the case.
Any systematic or automated data collection from this website is strictly prohibited. Submit corrections to firstname.lastname@example.org.
|#||Case Name||Number||Filing Date||For Party||Court||Case Type||
Riley v. Delaware River and Bay Authority
|661 F. Supp. 2d 456, Nos. 05-746-MPT, 07-336-MPT.||10/13/2009|
District Court, D. Delaware
Toll Bros., Inc. v. Considine
|706 A.2d 493, No. 148, 1997.||02/09/1998|
Supreme Court of Delaware
Per our terms of service (link below), any systematic or automated data collection from this website is strictly prohibited.