Attorney Statistics for Subrogation Cases in Our Database
Win rate not displayed due to local rules.
Benjamin has handled at least 1 subrogation cases in our database.
Benjamin settles an estimated 100.00% of subrogation cases and litigates 0.00% of subrogation cases to conclusion, based on our database. This lawyer has settled at least 1 subrogation case and litigated to conclusion at least 0 subrogation cases.
For purposes of this chart, both settlements and plea bargains are counted as settlements, as opposed to cases litigated to conclusion.
Benjamin has earned a good rating based on estimated win rate and experience in subrogation cases in our database. Benjamin has experience in subrogation cases.
Benjamin excels as a civil lawyer, earning high marks with a 4.5 star rating based on estimated win rate and experience. Some areas with particularly outstanding results are employment, employment injury, and government cases, to mention a few.
Benjamin also handles personal injury matters and earns a strong 4.5 star rating in that field. We would especially point out the attorney's results in car accident and medical malpractice cases.
Moreover, Benjamin appears to obtain impressive results in contracts cases, meriting a 4.5 star rating.
In addition, Benjamin's handling of business cases earns our 4.0 star rating.
Much more detailed information about this lawyer is presented in the charts and tables below.
We rate Benjamin's performance in each case type, and we also show the attorney's case outcomes used to compute our rating. The data in the following table are AI-computed estimates based on cases in our database.
Click on the details button below to learn more about the attorney's rating and performance in that case type.
Debt Relief / Collections
Interference with Business Relations
Similar Attorneys who handle Subrogation Cases near Ashburn
Our case-reading artificial intelligence program has analyzed Benjamin's cases from our database and summarized them in the following table. Click the details button for a detailed record of the case.
Any systematic or automated data collection from this website is strictly prohibited. Submit corrections to email@example.com.
|#||Case Name||Number||Filing Date||For Party||Court||Case Type||
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, et al. vs. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, et al.
|2013 SCJ 5925||12/09/2013|
DC Superior Court
Chasen Boscolo Chtd 7852 Walker Dr Ste 300
Greenbelt, MD 20770
Per our terms of service (link below), any systematic or automated data collection from this website is strictly prohibited.